Everything in one pile
A wiki, local folders, the support help center or PDFs. Nothing to separate brands and audiences with, and no single source.
Give products, brands, and markets independent Documentation Sites while shared content and the authoring team stay together. Use separate portals when data or teams need full isolation.
Every setup ends up on one side of that line, and pays for it on the other.
A wiki, local folders, the support help center or PDFs. Nothing to separate brands and audiences with, and no single source.
Every product got its own isolated unit. The content, team and permissions split with it, so shared material is maintained twice.
Separate repositories and builds. Every change, and even a review, waits on the engineering cycle.
Copies of the same guide per product, market and customer. Discrepancies surface after publication.
“We don't want a public site where client A and client B can find each other's knowledge bases.”
“It's very hard to manage four or even more different products inside one help center.”
ClickHelp lets you decide separately what readers see and what authors share.
How ClickHelp handles itUse Documentation Sites where content and teams should stay shared, and separate portals where isolation is required. Combine both when you need both.
The same three sites, all served from one portal.
The same three sites, split across two portals.
Choose the boundary that matches what actually needs to be separate.
Where you draw the boundary shapes your documentation process, not just your URLs: who reviews what, whose terminology governs a section, and which team owns a shared block. For large teams the answer is usually a combination — a portal per division, several Documentation Sites inside each.
It also decides how well AI works for you. A narrow context is better on both ends — the writing assistant checks against one product's terminology instead of averaging across the portfolio, and the reader assistant stops confusing products and versions.
| What you need apart | How you set it up | What stays shared |
|---|---|---|
| A brand and domain per product or market | A Documentation Site per brand: its own domain, theme, Reader UI and interface language, its own Home, Login and 404 pages, and its own selection of published content. | Everything authors touch — topics, snippets, variables, conditions, translations, users and permissions. |
| Audiences on the same site | Roles and access rules, so partners, resellers, individual customers and internal teams each see only what is meant for them. Configured by the documentation team, without IT. | All of it — one set of content, filtered per role rather than copied per audience. |
| Data, teams and permissions between divisions | Separate portals — for data that has to live apart by region, teams that must not overlap, or different email notification templates. | Nothing, by design. This is the isolation option, and it is the right one when isolation is the actual requirement. |
Separation only pays off if the split content stays governable from one place.
Every site pulls the section in by reference, so it updates everywhere at once — no copies to chase.
Each site publishes the version its audience is on.
Output tags assemble a per-customer guide with no separate copy.
Synonyms and tags follow that brand’s vocabulary; results stay isolated.
Developer docs update on their own site, outside the writing cycle.
Every product calls its own site from its own UI.
Reader behavior compared across brands and markets in one report.
Different tools solve different jobs well. The trade-off appears when one team needs multiple independent Documentation Sites without duplicating shared content or splitting the team.
ClickHelp is the only option here that does both. Open any pairing below to see where the others stop.
| Capability | ClickHelp | Team wikis | Support help centers | Desktop HAT | Dev doc generators | Isolated per-product units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Separate sites with their own domain and branding | Partial | Partial | ||||
| Separate sites without separating content and team | Partial | |||||
| Separate sites without separate accounts | Partial | |||||
| One source of content across all sites | Partial | |||||
| Role-based audience separation inside a site | Partial | Partial | Partial | |||
| Review and commenting in the browser | Partial | |||||
| Setup and publishing without developers | Partial | |||||
| Migration from external systems | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial |
Structure, images and formatting carry over. From desktop help-authoring tools, snippets, variables, conditional tags and the table of contents come across — proven on production projects.
From team wikis, excerpt macros become snippets. From Word, the reuse logic is set up fresh, because the source does not carry any.
Sites, themes, custom pages, publications and access are configured by the documentation team in the interface. A custom domain is optional — a Documentation Site works on the platform domain. If you want your own, delegating it is a one-time action on the IT side, not a standing dependency on the engineering cycle.
“For us, it's critical to know: if we export our current pages from Confluence to a new platform, will it completely retain the structure, images, and formatting without us losing anything?”
Which sites and portals your structure actually needs, what stays shared, and how the content you have maps onto that. We work with distributed, multi-product teams and can go through your case together.
Rated by the documentation teams who use it every day.
Most teams aren't, and the right answer depends on what actually needs to be apart — products, brands, markets or audiences. On the call we go through your case and lay out how it maps to Documentation Sites, portals and roles. Then try it on your own content.